Home
Topics
Images
Martial Fighters
VMAC 2007
Bruce's Movies
Jackie's Movies
MA Movie Top 100
Jeet Kune Do
Books & DVD's
More Links
Bruce-VS-Jackie.com
is an open community for martial arts movie fans

Updated: Fri 10.Oct.08 10:52
Online for 2304 days
2001 members

Registered members can leave comments, start discussions and add images.

Martial Arts Top 20

1. Bruce Lee
2. Jackie Chan
3. Jet Li
4. Steven Seagal
5. Jean Claude van Damme
6. Tony Jaa
7. Donnie Yen
8. Cynthia Rothrock
9. Michelle Yeoh
10. Sammo Hung
11. Brandon Lee
12. Bolo Yeung
13. Chow Yun Fat
14. Wesley Snipes
15. Shintaro Katsu
16. Pei Pei Cheng
17. Zhang Ziyi
18. Billy Chow
19. Stephan Chow
20. Chuck Norris

   | Archive
Complete list

Virtual Martial Arts Championship 2009


Lethal Weapon IV

Premise: Trouble-seeking buddy cops Riggs and Murtaugh return for a forth round of mayhem, this time to investigate the smuggling of illegal immigrants from China who are being sold into slavery. Their search leads them into a confrontation with a particularly brutal triad member (Jet Li).

Mel Gibson and Jet Li

Review: The Lethal Weapon series is up there with the Die Hard and Predator franchises as one of Hollywood's better action film properties. Coincidently, these are all part of producer Joel Silver's world of screen violence. For martial arts movie fans, that name is also important (for good or ill) because Silver is the man who put Jet Li on the Hollywood map after placing him in Lethal Weapon IV, followed by Romeo Must Die (2000) and Cradle 2 the Grave (2003). As Li's first Hollywood movie, Lethal Weapon IV is also notable for putting Li into his first villainous role and for pitting him against an A-list Hollywood actor in his prime, something even Jackie Chan couldn't boast of. As for the series, the same old formula wears thin with an overlong story too obsessed with fleshing out character subplots and rehashing old gags. Mel Gibson and Danny Glover still have the same great screen chemistry, but the jokes are forced, Joe Pesci is simply annoying, and Chris Rock is miscast. That leaves Jet Li to quietly steal the show with his fight work and strong screen presence.

For clowning police detectives Martin Riggs (Mel Gibson) and Roger Murtaugh (Danny Glover), it's business as usual when they find themselves faced with an armored assailant wielding an assault rifle and flame thrower. It's nothing a chicken-waddling Murtaugh, stripped to his boxers, can't handle. Shortly thereafter, the pair literally bump into a bigger problem when a cargo ship carrying smuggled immigrants from China nearly rams their boat. They take on the gun-totting smugglers and find several murdered victims which turns a case normally reserved for the INS, over to the local police. The case soon points to a Chinatown crime boss named Benny Chan (Kim Chan) who is in league with a Hong Kong triad member named Wah Sing-ku (Jet Li). Together, they are counterfeiting Chinese yuan to be exchanged for the release of four senior triad members held by Chinese authorities. As Riggs and Murtaugh each struggle through personal issues involving their loved ones, Wah makes the case personal when he crashes Murtaugh's home while looking for an immigrant (Eddy Ko Hung) and his family who Murtaugh had rescued from deportation. With the aid of screwball private eye Leo Getz (Joe Pesci) and Detective Lee Butters (Chris Rock), Riggs and Murtaugh uncover the counterfeiting scam and eventually drop in on the prisoner-money exchange to spoil the deal.

The number one issue with Lethal Weapon IV is not whether the film lives up to its predecessors or not, but whether Jet Li's performance can match the standards of his Hong Kong movie roles. The answer is yes and no. A small Hong Kong stunt team including Corey Yuen Kwai was brought in along with Li to lend some of that Hong Kong action magic to the film. The idea was to marry the best of Western and Eastern action filmmaking. In a number of ways, it works. The film has the usual pyrotechnics, street brawler fisticuffs, gunplay, and vehicular destruction one expects from Hollywood, while Li delivers lightning-fast moves that have no equal. He kicks the stuffing out of everyone he meets including Gibson, Glover and even Russo. His performance as a villain is surprisingly effective as he turns that stoic Wong Fei-hung look into a sinister look of cruel intent. It's understandable that Li had reservations about playing a villain as his ticket to Hollywood fame, but after looking at all of his subsequent Hollywood roles through 2003, his bad guy persona holds up very well.

Jet Li has four major fight scenes. They're obviously shorter and less outrageous than his Hong Kong fights, but Li's abilities are not diminished as a result. Rather, Donner adapts his fighting to the Hollywood shooting style. As a result, Gibson taking on Li seems a little more plausible. The end fight is the best. It's much more brutal and realistic than most of Li's Hong Kong film fights. This fight is actually a much better example of effectively combining the two action film styles than the excessive wire fu of Romeo Must Die or the CGI and wire excess of The One.

The rest of the action in Lethal Weapon IV is excellent. Within twelve minutes of the film's running time Gibson has already blown up a gas station and set a freighter on fire during a water-born shootout. A highlight is an elaborate car chase scene where Gibson climbs into a mobile home in transit on the highway to yank a driver out of a nearby car. Later, a car literally leaps into a high-rise building and out the other side. Director Richard Donner thankfully shoots almost all of these scenes free of CGI and they look great.

The weakest point of Lethal Weapon IV is the script. With a running time of 127 minutes, the film is much too long for a standard action movie and feels that way whenever the story dips into the various subplots meant to flesh out character development. After Gibson and Glover tackle Li in the finale, the film rambles on for another twenty minutes or so as the subplots are tied up. I can see where Donner and his team wanted to add dimension to the film and make the viewer care about the characters, but it's all too much by the time Joe Pesci goes into his sappy "Froggy" story. The franchise has become an ensemble comedy piece where Pesci has time to do his obnoxious "okay, okay" shtick, Russo and Gibson fuss over the prickly topic of marriage, and Glover mistakes Chris Rock's affection as a future son-in-law for homosexual advances. It's all neatly tied together, but too involved. Instead on focusing on the regular characters as much as they did, I would have preferred to see Eddy Ko Hung's relationship with Danny Glover fleshed out a bit more and the triad members given more time. Unfortunately, the film rushes through portions of the main plot and simply tosses in some voice-over narration to fill in the gaps.

The original Lethal Weapon (1987) is still the best in the series. As Hollywood fare, the sequels have held up reasonably well. Lethal Weapon IV certainly has a lot going for it in action sequences and in the main actors' camaraderie. Sticking Jet Li into the film was their best idea though. His performance is by far the most compelling and helps to overcome some of the more stale elements of a series that is more or less played out.

Share/Save/Bookmark  Subscribe
Article by: Tarzan, Monday, 18. September 2006, 07:20h
Add comment  (no comments)


Prodigal Son

Article by: Matt White

The Prodigal Son is probably Sammo Hung's masterpiece and one of the most ground breaking martial arts films of its time. According to Thomas Weisser's book, Asian Cult Cinema, Prodigal Son is considered to be the "birth of modern chop socky." I would have to be in agreement with this statement. However, as a history major in college I learned the importance of looking at patterns. Events do not "just happen"; there are several events that lead up to a certain occurrence. It would be good to understand the trends of Hong Kong cinema at the time that helped produce this excellent film.

First, one needs to understand traditional "chop socky" or kung fu films. This trend started in 1964 with the release of the Shaw Brothers produced and King Hu directed Come Drink With Me, a film that featured the debut of Cheng Pei Pei (who played Jade Fox in Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon). The film took a lot of influence from the films of Akira Kurosawa in terms of choreography and cinematography, but added a certain Chinese flavor. However, the films of King Hu such as Dragon Gate Inn and A Touch of Zen were more dramas with kung fu in them. Kung Fu films really took off with the release of Chang Cheh's The One Armed Swordsman (1966), a film that introduced action for the sake of action and gruesome fight scenes. This was followed by Shaw Brothers movies such as One Armed Swordsman 2, One Armed Boxer and Five Fingers of Death.

The stars of those movies, Cheng Pei Pei and Jimmy Wang Yu usually had to use stunt doubles. Golden Harvest upped the ante with the release of The Big Boss in 1971, starring an American born Chinese in Li Xiao-lung who used his English name, Bruce Lee. He did all his own fight scenes and worked with a stunt team of future stars in Sammo Hung, Jackie Chan, and Yuen Biao. After Lee's death in 1974, Golden Harvest abandoned kung fu films and opted to produce Cantonese dialect comedies (although Cantonese is the main dialect of Hong Kong, all movies before then were in Mandarin with Chinese and English subtitles). Due to this, Shaw Brothers had to raise the quality of their kung fu films (that were still highly profitable).

This led to a golden period for Shaw Brothers and kung fu films in general. The main directors at Shaw Brothers, Chang Cheh and Lau Kar-leung (Liu Chia-liang) produced a series of classic films with their own characteristics. Cheh stayed with the formula of Mandarin dialect, gory, kung fu films centered around all male casts, usually with themes of brotherhood and revenge. The results were classics like the Five Deadly Venoms, Five Tigers from Kwantung, and Five Element Ninja (Super Ninjas). Lau on the other hand made Cantonese dialect films, centered around kung fu technique and moral development. This produced the classics like 36th Chamber of Shaolin (Master Killer), Challenge of the Ninja (Heroes of the East) and Dirty Ho. Even though the tone of Cheh and Lau's films differed, they featured the same clichés of revenge and a really evil villain (usually a Manchu or Japanese), with the vengeance being transacted after the learning of a new kung fu technique. However, an alteration of this formula took place in the late 70's.

1978 saw the release of two films that would change the face of Hong Kong film for a long time: Snake In the Eagle's Shadow and Drunken Master. Both were directed by Yuen Woo-ping and starred a struggling movie actor by the name of Chan Sing-lung, known by his English name as Jackie Chan. The films infused comedy in the traditional kung fu mold (following the Cantonese comedy trend started by Golden Harvest) and gave spark to dying genre. Chan would follow up these two films by becoming a director himself and making The Fearless Hyena and Young Master (his first film for Golden Harvest), both being highly successful. This started a new trend of all kung fu movies including Shaw Brothers releases having some sort of comedy element.

To finally complete this cycle there are the so-called "New Wave" films of directors like Tsui Hark, Patrick Tam, Yim Ho and Ann Hui. In any new wave tradition its common practice is to take already established genres and turn them on their head. Patrick Tam's The Sword (1980) was one of the first to attempt this. Rather than being a typical "revenge my master" type of film, it had a story about a Swordsman seeking out a kung fu master just so he can duel with him, and along the way meeting a perky young female wannabe and a lost love (Sound somewhat familiar? It influenced Ang Lee to make Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon). All of this is told with a striking visual style that had not been seen in Shaw Brothers and Golden Harvest efforts. Hong Kong films soon began to take a much more visual tone.

scene from prodigal son

Okay, so its now 1981 and you have a film like Prodigal Son that infuses the traditional kung fu efforts of Shaw Brothers by being centered around learning a kung fu technique (Wing Chun in this movie), the comedy aspects of Golden Harvest films in general, and a more story oriented film with a non-traditional plot in the vein of the Hong Kong New Wave. The Prodigal Son is in actuality a prequel to a film that Sammo Hung had made three years earlier called Warriors Two. In that film the heroes meet an old kung fu master named Leung Chang, who teaches them the secrets of Wing Chun, allowing them to defeat the nasty villains. That was a traditional kung fu movie, and a very good one at that. The Prodigal Son is about Leung Chang when he is just a teenager and focuses on his maturation as he learns kung fu. The film, using Leung Chang as its main pivot point, becomes a parody and commentary about the evolution of kung fu films in Chinese culture.

When Leung Chang is first introduced, he is shown easily handling some guys who want to dispute his reputation of being the toughest fighter in his hometown of Fatshan (in Guangdong province). However, there is something that is not right about the fight. Leung Chang (Yuen Biao) is a spoiled rich kid, and unbeknownst to him his dad is paying off people to lose fights to him because he does not want to see his son hurt. He also makes sure the trainers go easy on Leung Chang. In a way, this can be seen as an allegory for the state of kung fu movies in the pre-Bruce Lee era. None of the main stars were legit fighters in that time and more experienced stunt men had to make them look good, usually putting their lives more at risk by taking sick bumps.

Leung Chang finds out that he is a horrible fighter when he has a duel with a Peking Opera performer named Leung Yee-tai (Lam Ching-ying). Most of the stunt men (and future stars) in the 1960's through late 1980's came from the Peking Opera tradition. Jackie Chan, Sammo Hung, Yuen Biao, Yuen Woo-ping, Corey Yuen, Yuen Wah, and Philip Kwok all got their start in Peking Opera. Even Jet Li received his training in a performance style of Kung Fu. The Opera was also the preserver of kung fu traditions because they were taught by exiled Shaolin Monks. During the late Manchu period and the modernization of China, the Opera performers were the ones who preserved the Chinese martial arts.

The main thrust however comes in the evolution of the film's protagonist (Leung Chang) and the "antagonist" Ngai (Frankie Chan). Ngai is the son of a Manchu ruler and really is a good fighter. Both are always looking for a fight, and look at fighting as some sort of hobby, with Ngai, who is from north China being in south China for the purpose of meeting great fighers. Ngai always wants to have "friendly" matches with people so he can test his kung fu ability, while Leung is always eager to pick a fight (even though the results are rigged). Similarly, Ngai has two bodyguards who kill any fighter they feel is a threat to Ngai.

In one scene, another play on traditional kung fu movies, Ngai meets man whom he crippled in the left arm a few years before. The man had now trained his right arm to defeat Ngai. He is dispensed with in no time flat and now has his right arm crippled as well. A few years before, this would have been the plot of a whole Kung Fu movie (see Chang Cheh's Crippled Avengers), but in this film its just a two minute scene, and the character does not even get his revenge. Another example of this is when Ngai finds out that his two bodyguards are killing his potential opponents. He just has them beheaded. In a normal kung fu movie, the protagonist would have to go through the two henchmen to get to the main bad guy (which happened in Warriors Two). The clichés of previous kung fu films are being turned on their heads.

Not to mention, Ngai is not particularly that evil in any sense of the imagination. He is much like Leung Chang. He is just a spoiled kid who has nothing else better to do than seek out good fights. The only thing that separates Leung Chang from Ngai is that in the end Leung matures and realizes that fighting is a very serious matter. Leung had the privilege of learning the real essence of kung fu from a seasoned master and layman in Leung Yee-tai and his "brother" Wong Wa-po (Sammo Hung in a great cameo). Ngai is in error, he is not evil, and that is how generally most people really are. Because of his insistence on fighting, it ends up killing Leung Yee-tai (he is poisoned by Ngai's bodyguards because he was considered too great a threat), which leads to Leung Chang to exact the revenge for his master. However, Leung Chang is only doing it to give Ngai the match that he never had with Leung Yee-tai and to show the futility of having a "friendly match."

Scene from Prodigal Son

There cannot be a review of this movie without talking about the fight choreography. It is close to being some of the best fighting put on celluloid. Sammo Hung searched all over Hong Kong for Wing Chun masters to learn everything about the famous but obscure kung fu technique. In order to completely convey the beauty of this fighting art, the fights are photographed in these beautiful long takes. Now granted there is not really any insanely long fight scenes that you would see in a Shaw Brothers film made a few years earlier, but that is not the thrust of the movie. When I first saw the movie I was put off by the truncated length of the climax, but looking back its fitting. Throughout the movie, Leung Chang is taught by Leung Yee-tai that fighting is about being ruthless, its not a game. The final fight is exactly that: ruthless. It reflects that Leung Chang has realized he is not there to play games but to win, and do it at any cost. To Ngai, it is still just a fun thing to do and he loses because of it.

The movie is about Wing Chun (and in a sense any art martial or otherwise) and how it develops moral character by creating discipline and a view of right and wrong. That was an important lesson then and still is today. Kung Fu films, wrestling and shoot fighting are great to watch (as was opera back then), but it is very easy to lose perspective of the seriousness of what is going on in all those mediums. Someone could get hurt very easily. With The Prodigal Son, Sammo Hung was trying to get back to the true root of martial arts and he did it by focusing on the discipline of a much heralded (Wing Chun was the initial form that Bruce Lee learned under the tutelage of the master Yip Man) but rare style.

Eastern Condors (1987) and Pedicab Driver (1989) are Sammo Hung's other best films, but Prodigal Son probably edges them out as his best. Both Eastern Condors and Pedicab Driver are flawed classics, but there are really no flaws in The Prodigal Son. It is filmed and acted brilliantly. The production design is first rate (as were most Golden Harvest period films, which always had bigger budgets than their Shaw counterparts), as is the cinematography by Hong Kong ace Ricky Lau. Lau went on to direct the really famous (and Hung produced) Mr. Vampire (1985), which also had great production design and photography (especially for a Hong Kong movie).

The comedic pacing, as in most Hung efforts, is first rate. It follows the typical pattern of situation comedy that Golden Harvest films in general do so well. This is also helped by the cast. Yuen Biao always did a good job of playing the wide-eyed and innocent teenager. In this film he probably gives his best execution of that sort of role. Unfortunately, it is a typecast that he could never shake. Another typecast done to perfection is the late Lam Ching-ying as Leung Yee-tai. Lam, a Sammo Hung stunt team regular, always did a great job of playing the older and wiser master, and would become famous for it in Mr. Vampire. Frankie Chan is really good as well as the spoiled kid Ngai. Chan would never really do anything of note outside of this film and he certainly never had a classic fight like the climax of this film.

It is a real shame that actor/director Sammo Hung has not got the credit he deserves in the west like his contemporaries Jackie Chan and Yuen Woo-ping. Most will only remember him briefly from the short lived TV series Martial Law. Unlike Chan and Yuen Woo-ping, Hung experimented with different genres and is the true leader of modernizing kung fu from its traditional structure. Ironically, he would never direct another kung fu movie until 1993 with the overlooked but really good Blade of Fury. Even though Jackie Chan popularized the contemporary kung fu actioner with Police Story (1985), it would not have happened if he did not star in the contemporary Hung directed films like Winners and Sinners, My Lucky Stars and Wheels on Meals. Even though all the aforementioned films were mega hits they were never taken seriously, usually they written off as ensemble action comedies (a sub-genre that Hung mastered and even top notch western directors like Steven Soderbergh cannot get right), however they set the stage for what Chan would do in the mid to late 80's.

The Prodigal Son changed kung fu films for good. That is why it is called the first "modern chop socky" because almost every kung fu film afterwards took a revisionist tone. The only traditional kung fu film of note after 1981 was Lau Kar-leung's 18 Legendary Weapons of China (1983). However, it was released in the sea of revisionist kung fu films like Jackie Chan's Young Master in Love, Ching Siu-tung's Duel To The Death and Tsui Hark's Zu: Warriors From the Magic Mountain. After 1983, the genre was dead and would not be revitalized until 1990-91 with the release of King Hu's The Swordsman and Tsui Hark's Once Upon A Time in China. However, those films did not follow the pattern of a Shaw Brothers movie. They followed the revisionist pattern set by Sammo Hung's The Prodigal Son.

Share/Save/Bookmark  Subscribe
Article by: Tarzan, Friday, 15. September 2006, 09:01h
Add comment  (no comments)



Your Status
You're not logged in ... login
Movie of the Month
Add comment  (no comments) | Archive
Latest comments
Tae kwon do
|'ve been doing tae kwon do for five years (but i'm only a blue belt, cant afford the gradings, collage student) now and i do have the ablity to take on some black belts but from what i've found is that it's the club that you join in my club i have a mixture of tae kwon do, mui thai, karete, and kickboxing and most of my masters are ex-pros so i get lots of experience. Also my brother does...
by Herbie_19 on 2008.10.10, 10:52
taekwondo championship
i want to play the taekwondo championship if there is any tournament then pl. do contact me as soon as possible
by ashwani on 2008.10.10, 09:33
Learning
www.yantaikungfu.com I was student in the school.unfortunately I left in advance last winter .At that moment,there are only several students. you know ,the terrible cold day outside ,the ice-cold room inside,he didn’t even provide any heat system.and deducted more than forty percent of my deserved refund without any reasons when I left earlier, a fake. more,I have heared from the translator that the true name of school is not “traditional kungfu school.he just put it into the internet.which put a cheat...
by Benweek4 on 2008.09.09, 01:32
pi**ed off sigung
people forget that sigung gathered a concept of ideas that suited him at the time, yes it was given a name but it was never a set system of martial art, ive studied a form of jkd for many years now but feel that too much is put on the idea of it being bruce lees product and something that can be bought, what jkd is for me isnt what it is for anyother in the world, its how you...
by frankfredrickson on 2008.09.03, 10:32
Steven Seagal's Doing Something....
Steven Seagal is doing something to better this planet that we all live on! What are you complainers doing--- oh yea that's right complaining instead of getting off your couches and helping to better the world around you! Can any of you say that you've stuck with a teaching or interest for more then a couple days or weeks? Well Steven Seagal Most Certainly Can!!! All Props to You Steven Keep Going We as A Human Race Need More People...
by BodiEire on 2008.08.30, 20:53
Hey, I really like this forum.
It's cool to see what other people think and believe about some of the most famous martial artists. I was reading gunz's and lohan?'s comments, and then looked at the long list, and stopped reading right around where lohan said that he respected gunz. idk, if this forum is outdated, and that my comment will mean nothing... but here are my two cents anyway... Bruce Lee is great. Jet Li is great. Jackie Chan... is just crazy. Ha :) I think that...
by Bourne Philosophy on 2008.08.27, 03:08
Why Jackie chan would not last 1 round with bruce lee.
Bruce Lees style that he created himself jeet kwan do. (the art on no style). Ranked supreme during his time it broke down the all of the of the flaws of gung fu, kung fu, shaolin, boxing mu thai, judo etc. Jeet kwan do was all of the style combined into one style. If Jackie chan came at bruce with just his simple shaolin munk fighting style it would only be seconds before Bruce Lee would pick him apart. I...
by hammy sammy on 2008.08.10, 18:37
Bruce lee is the greatest "why?"
Bruce lee is the greatest because he was the best at every popular fighting style at his time. If he lived in our era he would have studied brazilian jui jitzu and all of the other styles that have emerged in the ufc, k-1 etc. The best fighter is the who can adapt to all styles and that was what bruce lee was all about he trained and worked harder than any fighter ever. If there was a modern day...
by hammy sammy on 2008.08.10, 18:21
jet li two years of shoalin
wushu is a communist sport that has useless forms but he has two years of real shaolin training and can kill you misinformed idiots
by isdc_member on 2008.08.10, 08:06
Debating On Fighting
Well i'm new, but I read some of these comments and their all very biased. I can tell its your opinion. Anyways I was wonderin what style Jackie Chan or Bruce Lee uses.
by ABZ_SoNnY_1226 on 2008.07.02, 01:57
Special Offers
VMAC 2009

XML version of this page

Please use this logo to link to this pages:

logo for links

version 7.02 - copyright Bruce VS Jackie 2006